StarMap: FAQ

Over the last few months I've received several questions, so it's probably a good time to write a FAQ about StarMap.

Q: Who wrote StarMap, and how was it set up?
A: StarMap was written by Bob Donahue of the Center for Astrophysics (and Mount Wilson Observatory) in order to provide some sort of WWW/online service for amateur and backyard astronomy enthusiasts. It is written in FORTRAN and linked to a customized version of the MONGO graphics library.

Q: Can I get a copy of the source code?
A: Not at this time. Since the graphics library is an unofficial patch, it wouldn't do much good. Most of the astronomy-related routines come from the book "Astronomical Formulæ for Calculators" by J. Meeus (ISBN 0-943396-01-8).

Q: I can't get the form to work properly!
A: This would depend your site's OS/platform and what Web browser you are using. I do know that Netscape has the least problems, so you should look into getting it.

Q: I get the file back, but I don't have a way to view it...
A: You need a PostScript previewer (like GhostScript). Check the more popular FTP sites for whatever platform you are using.

Q: Sometimes the PostScript files come back with errors - why?
A: I'm not sure - this didn't happen with the testbed I set up while debugging the program. It appears to be related to the transmission of the file and not its creation. I'm still trying to track it down and fix it. Usually, running the form again gives a printable file.

Q: The PostScript files are SO LONG!
A: Yeah - the PostScript driver for MONGO was hastily written. I'm purusing other possibilities for a graphics package, and if one of them works, I'll set it up as a future version (this will also hopefully solve the "broken PostScript file" problem).

Q: Can I get a GIF/JPEG/TIFF/XBM image instead of PostScript?
A: Yes, if you use a program that converts PostScript to your desired format. PostScript was chosen for three reasons: 1) At 300 DPI the resulting file printed out looks much better than anything on a screen (which is typically something like 72 DPI); 2) The idea was to provide something people could then take outside and use while looking at the sky - thus GIF/JPEG/etc. isn't practical; 3) MONGO had this as an option for output and it was more-or-less easy to set up. (MONGO also has a very inefficient driver for PostScript! I'm researching other options, and might make a switch at a later date.)

Q: My city isn't on the list of cities - how are they chosen?
A: For the most part, they are picked by looking at the statistics of what longitude/latitude pairs are selected. In other cases, cities were chosen to provide interesting examples (e.g., Quito Ecuador). Every few weeks, I'll look at the distribution of coordinates, see if there's enough interest in an area to put in an entry and update the files.
I have an idea for a way to at least give the user a rough idea of what his/her latitude and longitude is. I'm still working out how to install it.

Q: Why is it in Universal Time (and what is UT anyway?)?
A: UT was chosen for two reasons. First it eliminates needing to worry which geographical area was in which timezone, and what to do with different areas going through Daylight Savings Time (remember some countries in Europe are now on DST, and in the US some parts *don't* go on DST - everyone keeping up? :-)
So, to make it easier, all times are in universal time (UT). UT is roughly defined as the time in Greenwich, England. It's 5 hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time (4 hours ahead of Eastern Daylight Time).
July 14, 1996: The new version of the StarMap Home Page shows the current Universal Time above the box for UT. So, a quick way to figure out the offset from your local time to UT would be to compare the time it says when you load up the form and the UT listed.

Q: Can I make copies of the map and distribute it to my class/club/etc.?
A: YES! This would be wonderful. The only requirements are that 1) the map cannot be sold or bundled in a package that is sold, and 2) the URL and copyright notice MUST remain with the map.

Q: I'd like to be able to zoom in on a particular constellation or area of the sky - can I do this?
A: No - but fear not - that's a project I'm thinking of doing when I get a chance! (I need a good complete atlas down to, oh, V=14 - if anyone has a pointer to one let me know). I'm also hoping to set up an online "observers" guide with constellation charts, and some pictures from the 24" TIE telescope. But all these things takes time to do them.
July 14, 1996: If there are one or two people out there who are really interested in astronomy, and are experienced with the night sky, already have an account with telnet capabilities, know HTML and UNIX and want to help me out on setting up part of an online guide to the stars (think something like an online up-to-date Burnham's Celestial Handbook) let me know. The HTML and UNIX experience are absolutely necessary!

Q: I'd like to see constellation names, boundaries, Messier Objects, double star designations, etc. on the map...
A: This would clutter the map. I do intend to put some of things options in, when I get a chance. The constellation boundaries are a little bit of a problem since they are defined along epoch 1875 parallels, and would have to be precessed to the current epoch (so no straight lines!). The names would have to find places where they didn't intersect with stars, lines, etc. The Messier objects would probably want SOME kind of on-map legend (again avoiding stars and lines). As I solve some of the logistics for doing this, I'll definitely add those options in.
July 14, 1996: I'm still looking for a source for Milky Way boundaries to add that in. As usual, if someone knows of a source for this data, please let me know

Q: The Galactic Equator seems a little off...
A: Oh, you noticed that too? :-) It's probably a bug, but my forumlas for galactic coordinates seem OK.

Q: It'd be nice to have lists of constellations, bright stars, etc., on the Services page to go with the StarMaps...
A: Yes - and it's also something I'd like to undertake when I have the time. (See above plea for a volunteer or two.)

Q: I went out and didn't see all the moons even though StarMap had them all there...
A: StarMap doesn't (yet) keep track of the Jovian shadow, so moons in the shadow are still plotted. (Again, if you have an algorithm and would like to share it....)

Q: How about phases of Venus or Mercury?
A: That would be neat - again I'll have to have the time and figure out where to put it! (I suppose this could be selected or set automagically swapping the Jupiter/Saturn panels depending on which planets were "up"...)

Q: How about Sunset/sunrise and Moonset/moonrise?
A: On the list of things to get put in...

Q: How about Solar position?
A: On the list of things to be put in...

Bob Donahue

Last Updated: